|
Name
|
Description
|
Best Used For
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
|
Separation
|
Separated, but not
divorced.
|
- Couple does not want
t to divorce for
r religious or other
r reasons
Can have child
s support,maintenance,
a and property
s settlement
|
- Gives children and
s spouse time to adjust
Gives couple time to
settle property
May retain health
insurance
|
May prolong
process
May be more
expensive
"New life" may not
be possible
|
|
Pro-Se
|
Divorces filed
without the
assistance of an
attorney.
|
Couples with few
disputes
Couples with few
assets – and those
easily divisible
Childless couples
|
Inexpensive
Fairly quick
|
May make legal
mistakes
May make
financial errors
calculating support
or division of
property & debt
allocation
No professional
help on legal,
financial or
emotional issues
|
|
Mediation
|
Couple uses a
mediator to help
voluntarily settle
disputes over issues.
Voluntarily settle
disputes over issues.
Mediator may help
draw up paperwork.
Mediator may or
may not be an
attorney.
|
Couples who have
issues to settle, but
nothing that has to
go to court
|
Can be less
expensive than
traditional method
Neutral third party,
experienced in
mediation
Less
adversarial
|
No one
completely "on
your side"
Not appropriate if spouse becomes
difficult
May need to
resort to
traditional divorce
Either party (or
both) may decide
to retain attorney
Even if mediator is an attorney, each may need review of paperwork by
separate attorney
(QDROs, etc.)
|
|
Single
Attorney for
Couple
|
One spouse retains a
single attorney to file
for divorce.
All paperwork
completed and filed
by attorney.
Note: Ethically,
attorney may only
represent one party.
|
Reasonable,
amicable divorces
|
Less expensive than
2 attorneys
Less adversarial
Can be a fairly quick process
|
One party has the
benefit of legal
advice, the other
does not
Not appropriate if
divorce becomes
difficult
|
|
Traditional
|
Each spouse has
their own attorney.
|
Situations where
spouse is difficult,
non-cooperative
Divorce has legal
issues that require
expert advice
|
Someone completely
on your side
Expert confidential
legal advice
Traditional approach
|
Can be adversarial
Can be expensive
Is not always a
cooperative
experience
May become a
longer process
Can destroy the
emotional and
financial facets of the family
|
|
Collaborative
|
Each side has
attorney.
Each side has access
to or is required to
use other specialists
(coaches, child
coaches, financial
experts, etc.).
All professionals
have been trained in
collaborative process.
All agree to
collaboration and
work together to
resolve issues.
If this fails, all
professionals
withdraw, and the
spouses retain other
counsel -- and
professionals -- and
may go to the
traditional divorce
method or other
method.
|
Couples who wish
to keep divorce
private and avoid the loss of control over their family and money in open court.
|
Less expensive than
a traditional contested
May be more
productive
Each party has a
person looking out
for their best interests
|
Not appropriate if spouse becomes
very difficult
If process breaks
down, spouses
will need to retain
new attorneys
|